Visions Of Infinity The Great Mathematical Problems Pdf
See a Problem?
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Friend Reviews
Community Reviews
This book is trying to address a very difficult task: to present in a meaningful way, to the general public, complex open problems in modern mathematics. A huge challenge.
The author is trying too hard to indulge the mathematically challenged by refusing to use proper mathematical notation (and adopting natural language instead) even where proper mathematical notation would have made the treatment so much clearer. I found myself converting, in my mind, some long, cumbersome statements by the aut
This book is trying to address a very difficult task: to present in a meaningful way, to the general public, complex open problems in modern mathematics. A huge challenge.
The author is trying too hard to indulge the mathematically challenged by refusing to use proper mathematical notation (and adopting natural language instead) even where proper mathematical notation would have made the treatment so much clearer. I found myself converting, in my mind, some long, cumbersome statements by the author into the corresponding maths.
And many statements by the author, even if devoid of any mathematical formula, do actually necessarily imply some good background mathematical knowledge anyway, so the lack of mathematical notation does not really make the treatment more accessible to the general user, only more confusing.
This is compounded by lack of mathematical derivations when actual formulas are presented.
Some parts are done nicely, such as the explanation of Fermat's last theorem, but other parts touch mathematics only very succinctly (example: P versus NP, Mass Gap Hypothesis, Navier-Stokes equation) and leave the reader wanting for more.
Overall, a mixed bag. Not too bad but I have seen better.
To really understand maths, you need maths - trying to explain, to the mathematically naive, the peculiarities of the Navier-Stocks equation, without using any maths whatsoever, is so ambitious as to be almost delusional. I understood exactly what the author meant in this particular chapter, but I had previously studied ordinary and partial differential equations of many types in the past, so I wonder how much a reader with no prior knowledge would be able to actually understand this subject.
I do not want to sound elitist, but there are limits to how widely intrinsically complex mathematical problems can be popularized - and this book achieves its objectives only to a limited extent, I am afraid. Pity, as the author is clearly competent and enthusiastic.
...more
In this book, he faced a huge challenge: To explain mathematics' most formidable problems. He has done an admirable job. Explaining the meaning of each problem, let alone why it might be important to us, and how one might approach solving the problem, is a major challenge.
It would be difficult for me to imagine how anyone else could do a better job than Stewart does. H
I'm a fan of Ian Stewart. I own many of his books, and he has a gift for explaining mathematical concepts in understandable ways.In this book, he faced a huge challenge: To explain mathematics' most formidable problems. He has done an admirable job. Explaining the meaning of each problem, let alone why it might be important to us, and how one might approach solving the problem, is a major challenge.
It would be difficult for me to imagine how anyone else could do a better job than Stewart does. However, as I read deeper into this book, I found the material more challenging. I was trained as a physicist, and so do not have a fear of mathematics (although that is a long way from actually being a Mathematician -- they definitely think differently from most of us!). I might have had a harder time without that strong mathematical background.
Recommended for those with sufficient background and perseverance.
...more
But what Stewart is good at is explaining the steps that mathematicians take to tackle t
A grade above most popularization books on technical subjects in that there is no hope of understanding the issues involved in 90% of the problems Stewart addresses. At least with string theory, genetic engineering, chaos theory etc. the layman has an intuitive first step on the ladder to understanding. Some of these problems are unimaginable to the non-mathematician and cannot be explained to any real depth.But what Stewart is good at is explaining the steps that mathematicians take to tackle these problems and the intuition and drudgery involved. Sometimes inhuman genius is needed, sometimes years of calculation and minute bookkeeping. Stewart knows the life of the mathematician and can explain that world very well - not a gift that a high functioning academic always has!
Stewart is also very good at what makes a "great" problem. It has to have a lot of substance in solving it and the solution opens up vistas that weren't even known to exist before. Sometimes a trivial problem (like Fermat's "last" theorem - trivial because nothing really "hung" on its solution, other than a lot of historical momentum) becomes great through all the diverse areas of mathematics it took to solve it.
...more
The way "solve" is being use
An hoary old philosophical conundrum asks if God could create a rock so heavy even he couldn't lift it. Mathematicians never have to ask if they could come up with problems so tough to solve that they could never figure them out, because they work with and around such problems all the time. Ian Stewart lays out several of them in Visions of Infinity; some were solved after much work and some remained unsolved when he wrote the book in 2013. Some might never be solved.The way "solve" is being used here is slightly different than the way it might be used in other circumstances. Solving a math problem means finding what happens to the numbers after they've been processed according to the rules represented by the symbols accompanying them: 2+2 "solved" is 4. Solving an equation with a variable in it means processing those numbers in a way that will transform an unknown variable into a known number: Solving for x in "x+2=4" means finding out that x=2.
But solving the problems that Stewart talks about means demonstrating that certain math statements with nothing but unknown variables will always be true, no matter what numbers are plugged into them. Or that they won't be, by finding a set of numbers for which the equation will be false.
Visions is a brief look at several such problems and the story either of how they came to be and why they are still mysterious or how they were solved. It is not a quick read; some of the problems are interconnected and Stewart has a habit of dragging concepts from earlier chapters up without much of a signal or refresher of what they might entail. Some of his explanations of where the equations came from are as head-scratching as the equations themselves and furnish a reader with some seriously dense slogging.
Even though some of the math Stewart talks about may have even less of a "real world" application than algebra does in the eyes of a middle-schooler, he argues that it's still very important. Attempts to solve several of the problems in Visions led to many other mathematical breakthroughs and even failures often helped bring about a clearer understanding of the way the world works. And even if they did not, exploring math's outer reaches is no less a voyage of discovery than those taken the ancients who first ventured out of sight of land. Should human beings who seek to satisfy their curiosity about the physical world stop just because the frontiers are in the minds of the explorers? Stewart's answer in the different chapters of Visions may be complicated and take a long time to understand, but it boils down to, "No, they shouldn't," which sounded right to me before I read his book and still does afterwards.
Original available here.
...more
But I don't know whom this book is for, or rather if many such people exist. It is way too technical for the lay audience and way too slow for mathematicians, who are already convinced in the book's main thesis -- that math is interesting. I guess there may be some sufficiently technical folks out there who missed out on the beauty of math, who are the target au
I really wanted to like this book. I read Ian Stewart's column in Scientific American as a kid, and it helped me fall in love with math.But I don't know whom this book is for, or rather if many such people exist. It is way too technical for the lay audience and way too slow for mathematicians, who are already convinced in the book's main thesis -- that math is interesting. I guess there may be some sufficiently technical folks out there who missed out on the beauty of math, who are the target audience and who would appreciate this book more, but it's hard to imagine there are many of them.
I am in the category of people who do math for a living, so I can speak to my experience of reading this book. I kept waiting for Stewart to get to the main mathematical points and to provide rigorous definitions, which often never came. The book did have some interesting explanations and historical gems that I enjoyed, but it was too much tedium to get to them.
...more
--from the author's website
Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the GoodReads database with this name. See other au
Ian Nicholas Stewart is an Emeritus Professor and Digital Media Fellow in the Mathematics Department at Warwick University, with special responsibility for public awareness of mathematics and science. He is best known for his popular science writing on mathematical themes.--from the author's website
Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the GoodReads database with this name. See other authors with similar names.
...moreRelated Articles
Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
Visions Of Infinity The Great Mathematical Problems Pdf
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15843078-visions-of-infinity
Posted by: stainbrookmork1972.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Visions Of Infinity The Great Mathematical Problems Pdf"
Post a Comment